Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.391
Filtrar
1.
JMIR Aging ; 7: e52317, 2024 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656768

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As the population ages and the prevalence of long-term diseases rises, the use of telecare is becoming increasingly frequent to aid older people. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the use and adoption of 3 types of telehealth services among the older population in Israel before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We explored the use characteristics of older adults (aged ≥65 years) belonging to Clalit Health Services in several aspects in the use of 3 types of telehealth services: the use of digital services for administrative tasks; the use of synchronous working-hours telehealth visits with the patient's personal physician during clinic business hours; and the use of after-hours consultations during evenings, nights, and weekends when the clinics are closed. The data were collected and analyzed throughout 3 distinct periods in Israel: before the COVID-19 pandemic, during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and following the COVID-19 peak. RESULTS: Data of 618,850 patients who met the inclusion criteria were extracted. Telehealth services used for administrative purposes were the most popular. The most intriguing finding was that the older population significantly increased their use of all types of telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic, and in most types, this use decreased after the COVID-19 peak, but to a level that was higher than the baseline level before the COVID-19 pandemic. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, 23.1% (142,936/618,850) of the study population used working-hours telehealth visits, and 2.2% (13,837/618,850) used after-hours consultations at least once. The percentage of use for these services increased during the COVID-19 pandemic to 59.2% (366,566/618,850) and 5% (30,777/618,850) and then decreased during the third period to 39.5% (244,572/618,850) and 2.4% (14,584/618,850), respectively (P<.001). Multiple patient variables have been found to be associated with the use of the different telehealth services in each period. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations and obstacles, the older population uses telehealth services and can increase their use when they are needed. These people can learn how to use digital health services effectively, and they should be given the opportunity to do so by creating suitable and straightforward telehealth solutions tailored to this population and enhancing their usability.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Israel/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias
3.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1384078, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38645451

RESUMEN

Background: The quality assessment of the home-based isolation and care program (HBIC) relies heavily on patient satisfaction and length of stay. COVID-19 patients who were isolated and received HBIC were monitored through telephone consultations (TC), in-person TC visits, and a self-reporting application. By evaluating patient satisfaction and length of stay in HBIC, healthcare providers could gauge the effectiveness and efficiency of the HBIC program. Methods: A cross-sectional study design enrolled 444 HBIC patients who answered a structured questionnaire. A binary logistic regression model assessed the association between independent variables and patient satisfaction. The length of stay in HBIC was analyzed using Cox regression analysis. The data collection started on April (1-30), 2022, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Results: The median age was 34, and 247 (55.6%) were females. A greater proportion (313, 70.5%) of the participants had high satisfaction. Higher frequency of calls (>3 calls) (AOR = 2.827, 95% CI = 1.798, 4.443, p = 0.000) and those who were symptomatic (AOR = 2.001, 95% CI = 1.289, 3.106, p = 0.002) were found to be significant factors for high user satisfaction. Higher frequency of calls (>3 calls) (AHR = 0.537, 95% CI = 0.415, 0.696, p = 0.000) and more in-person visits (>1 visit) (AHR = 0.495, 95% CI = 0.322, 0.762, p = 0.001) had greater chances to reduce the length of stay in the COVID-19 HBIC. Conclusion: 70.5% of the participants had high satisfaction with the system, and frequent phone call follow-ups on patients' clinical status can significantly improve their satisfaction and length of recovery. An in-person visit is also an invaluable factor in a patient's recovery.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Satisfacción del Paciente , Telemedicina , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Etiopía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Cuarentena , Anciano
4.
Pan Afr Med J ; 47: 51, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646140

RESUMEN

Introduction: digital health has been demonstrated to improve the efficiency and scale of health service delivery in resource-limited settings. Understanding factors influencing its use could accelerate the process of its implementation in routine practice. Methods: we conducted a cross-sectional analytic study in Buea and Tiko health districts from January to May 2021. We included healthcare workers selected using multistage stratified sampling. Use of digital health was defined as using at least two digital tools and one digital health intervention (DHI) or at least two DHIs by a healthcare worker. Epi Info was used for statistical analysis. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with the use of digital health. Results: in total, 221 participants were included in the study. The mean age was 33±9.1 years and 76.5% were female. Only 39.4% (n=87) of participants used digital health. The most frequently used digital tools for health-related purposes included: Microsoft (MS) Excel (29.9%), MS PowerPoint (26.8%) and MS Word (39.1%). The main DHIs used were research (30.2%) and diagnosing (24.1%) software. The main use of digital health was for research (75.6%). Owning a laptop (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.98, 95% CI, 1.01 - 3.86), availability of internet connection in the health facility (1.99, 1.05 - 3.7) and receiving professional training in ICT/Computer Sciences (2.04, 1.06 - 3.93), were associated with higher odds of using digital health. Conclusion: this study shows a low level of use of digital health by healthcare workers. Providing newer devices, internet connection in health facilities and training in ICT for healthcare workers could improve its uptake.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Camerún , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Atención a la Salud , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , 60713
5.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 10: e51279, 2024 Apr 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669075

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic rapidly changed the landscape of clinical practice in the United States; telehealth became an essential mode of health care delivery, yet many components of telehealth use remain unknown years after the disease's emergence. OBJECTIVE: We aim to comprehensively assess telehealth use and its associated factors in the United States. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a nationally representative survey (Health Information National Trends Survey) administered to US adults (≥18 years) from March 2022 through November 2022. To assess telehealth adoption, perceptions of telehealth, satisfaction with telehealth, and the telehealth care purpose, we conducted weighted descriptive analyses. To identify the subpopulations with low adoption of telehealth, we developed a weighted multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Among a total of 6252 survey participants, 39.3% (2517/6252) reported telehealth use in the past 12 months (video: 1110/6252, 17.8%; audio: 876/6252, 11.6%). The most prominent reason for not using telehealth was due to telehealth providers failing to offer this option (2200/3529, 63%). The most common reason for respondents not using offered telehealth services was a preference for in-person care (527/578, 84.4%). Primary motivations to use telehealth were providers' recommendations (1716/2517, 72.7%) and convenience (1516/2517, 65.6%), mainly for acute minor illness (600/2397, 29.7%) and chronic condition management (583/2397, 21.4%), yet care purposes differed by age, race/ethnicity, and income. The satisfaction rate was predominately high, with no technical problems (1829/2517, 80.5%), comparable care quality to that of in-person care (1779/2517, 75%), and no privacy concerns (1958/2517, 83.7%). Younger individuals (odd ratios [ORs] 1.48-2.23; 18-64 years vs ≥75 years), women (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09-1.61), Hispanic individuals (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05-1.80; vs non-Hispanic White), those with more education (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.03-2.87; at least a college graduate vs less than high school), unemployed individuals (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.54), insured individuals (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.25-2.69), or those with poor general health status (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.30-2.13) had higher odds of using telehealth. CONCLUSIONS: To our best knowledge, this is among the first studies to examine patient factors around telehealth use, including motivations to use, perceptions of, satisfaction with, and care purpose of telehealth, as well as sociodemographic factors associated with telehealth adoption using a nationally representative survey. The wide array of descriptive findings and identified associations will help providers and health systems understand the factors that drive patients toward or away from telehealth visits as the technology becomes more routinely available across the United States, providing future directions for telehealth use and telehealth research.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Pandemias , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
JMIR Aging ; 7: e50938, 2024 Apr 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654578

RESUMEN

Background: The occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic demanded fast changes in the delivery of health care. As a result, significant growth in the use of telemedicine services occurred. Research, especially from nationally representative German samples, is needed to better understand determinants of telemedicine use. Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify determinants of telemedicine service use among middle-aged and older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Methods: Cross-sectional, nationally representative data were taken from the German sample of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). The German Corona Survey 2 (n=2039), which was conducted between June and August 2021, was used for this study. Reporting experience with remote medical consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic served as the outcome measure. Associations with socioeconomic, psychological, social, health-related, and COVID-19-related determinants were examined using multiple Firth logistic regressions. Results: Psychological factors including feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% CI 1.04-2.50; P=.03), feeling sad or depressed (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.05-2.51; P=.03) and feelings of loneliness (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.07-2.58; P=.02) were positively associated with telemedicine use. Moreover, forgoing medical treatment because of being afraid of being infected by SARS-CoV-2 (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.10-2.97; P=.02) and describing limitations because of a health problem as severe were positively associated with the outcome (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.12-4.00; P=.02). Socioeconomic and social factors were not significantly associated with telemedicine use in our sample. Conclusions: Middle-aged and older individuals in Germany seem to use telemedicine services according to psychological needs and health limitations. Especially when psychological symptoms are experienced, telemedicine seems to be a promising service option in this age group. Future research is needed to confirm these initial findings in postpandemic circumstances.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Alemania/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pandemias
8.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 9: e47556, 2023 09 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37773621

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in known risk factors for mental health problems. Although medical information available through the internet and smartphones has greatly expanded, people's ability to seek, eschew, and use reliable web-based medical information and services to promote their mental health remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the associations between coronaphobia and 4 frequently reported mental health problems, loneliness, irritability, depression, and stigma, during the COVID-19 pandemic and to assess the moderating effects of eHealth literacy (eHL) on the adjustment of these relationships in Chinese young adults. METHODS: The data used in this study were collected from a web-based survey of the general Chinese population, aged between 18 and 30 years, conducted in China between December 2022 and January 2023. A nonprobability snowball sampling method was used for data collection. A Bayesian structural equation model (BSEM) using parameter expansion was used to estimate the moderating effect of eHL on the relationship between coronaphobia and psychological problems. The posterior mean and 95% highest density intervals (HDIs) were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 4119 participants completed the questionnaire and provided valid responses. Among them, 64.4% (n=2653) were female and 58.7% (n=2417) were rural residents. All measures showed statistically significant but minor-to-moderate associations (correlation coefficients ranged from -0.04 to 0.65). Significant heterogeneity was observed between rural and urban residents at the eHL level, and coronaphobia was observed. The BSEM results demonstrated that eHL was a significant moderator in reducing the negative effects of coronaphobia on loneliness (posterior mean -0.0016, 95% HDI -0.0022 to -0.0011), depression (posterior mean -0.006, 95% HDI -0.0079 to -0.004), stigma (posterior mean -0.0052, 95% HDI -0.0068 to -0.0036), and irritability (posterior mean -0.0037, 95% HDI -0.0052 to -0.0022). The moderating effects of eHL varied across the rural and urban subsamples. CONCLUSIONS: Using BSEM, this study demonstrated that improving eHL can significantly mitigate the negative effects of coronaphobia on 4 COVID-19-related mental health problems in Chinese young adults. Future eHL initiatives should target rural communities to ensure equal access to information and resources that can help protect their mental health during the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Depresión , Alfabetización en Salud , Soledad , Estigma Social , Telemedicina , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Teorema de Bayes , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/etnología , COVID-19/psicología , Depresión/epidemiología , Pueblos del Este de Asia/psicología , Pueblos del Este de Asia/estadística & datos numéricos , Alfabetización en Salud/métodos , Soledad/psicología , Pandemias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
J Med Internet Res ; 25: e39089, 2023 08 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37616031

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In China, a form of online health service called the internet hospital became a prominent means of patient care when face-to-face visits were not possible during the COVID-19 pandemic to minimize transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Patients' internet hospital experiences largely depend on online physician-patient interaction. Yet, little is known about how physicians can improve patient satisfaction by using specific communication strategies online. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify specific communication strategies to help physicians deliver better quality internet hospital services. We also outline recommendations for hospitals to operate internet hospital platforms more effectively. METHODS: A longitudinal data set was collected from an internet hospital platform operated by a top hospital in China. By extracting communication patterns from approximately 20,000 records of online health care services and by controlling the features of service requests, we tested the impacts of response load, more detailed style, and emotional comfort on patient satisfaction. We further explored the effects of these communication patterns in different service contexts. RESULTS: Physicians with a low response load, a more detailed style, and expressions of emotional comfort received more positive patient feedback. Response load did not affect patient satisfaction with free online health service, whereas a more detailed style and emotional comfort enhanced satisfaction with free service. Response load significantly reduced patient satisfaction with paid online health service, while a more detailed style had no effect. Compared with free service, emotional comfort more strongly promoted patient satisfaction with paid service. CONCLUSIONS: The communication strategies identified can help physicians provide patients with a better internet hospital experience. These strategies require hospitals to schedule each physician's online service period more appropriately. In addition, tailoring the strategies to service situations can facilitate more targeted and effective internet hospital service for patients.


Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Telemedicina , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/normas , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Comunicación , Sistemas en Línea
10.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 36(5): 755-765, 2023 10 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37648405

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has transformed the landscape of telemedicine utilization, shifting from predominantly in-person services to increased virtual encounters. Although telemedicine offers increased accessibility for medical care, many advocates voice concern about utilization and satisfaction with these services among individuals who experience intimate partner violence (IPV) given the unique practical, mental, and physical health challenges many face. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate differences in telemedicine utilization and satisfaction, as well as global health and perceived loneliness, among data-driven patterns of IPV during the early phases of the pandemic. METHODS: In this longitudinal survey study, participants first completed an online survey between May 2019 and February 2020 that assessed social, psychological, and physical functioning, as well as emotional and physical IPV. A follow-up survey sent in May 2020 assessed recent telemedicine use and satisfaction, as well as response to the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Latent class analysis favored 4 classes of IPV that differed based on severity and features of IPV experienced. Although all 4 classes reported high satisfaction with telemedicine, individuals reporting low IPV had the highest satisfaction with telemedicine and the lowest rates of telemedicine utilization. Individuals who experienced IPV, particularly multiple forms of emotional and physical IPV, reported high physical and social concerns and perceived stress. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians using telemedicine should be aware of the multiple challenges faced by individuals experiencing IPV and take additional steps to ensure their needs are met in a safe way. These results have potentially important clinical and policy implications.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Violencia de Pareja , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Emociones , Violencia de Pareja/psicología , Pandemias , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1014302, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36935672

RESUMEN

Background: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, it was foreseen that the number of face-to-face psychiatry consultations would suffer a reduction. In order to compensate, the Australian Government introduced new Medicare-subsidized telephone and video-linked consultations. This study investigates how these developments affected the pre-existing inequity of psychiatry service delivery in Australia. Methods: The study analyses five and a half years of national Medicare data listing all subsidized psychiatry consultation consumption aggregated to areas defined as Statistical Area level 3 (SA3s; which have population sizes of 30 k-300 k). Face-to-face, video-linked and telephone consultations are considered separately. The analysis consists of presenting rates of consumption, concentration graphs, and concentration indices to quantify inequity, using Socio Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) scores to rank the SA3 areas according to socio-economic disadvantage. Results: There is a 22% drop in the rate of face-to-face psychiatry consultation consumption across Australia in the final study period compared with the last study period predating the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the loss is made up by the introduction of the new subsidized telephone and video-linked consultations. Referring to the same time periods, there is a reduction in the inequity of the distribution of face-to-face consultations, where the concentration index reduces from 0.166 to 0.129. The new subsidized video-linked consultations are distributed with severe inequity in the great majority of subpopulations studied. Australia-wide, video-linked consultations are also distributed with gross inequity, with a concentration index of 0.356 in the final study period. The effect of this upon overall inequity was to cancel out the reduction of inequity resulting from the reduction of face-to face appointments. Conclusion: Australian subsidized video-linked psychiatry consultations have been distributed with gross inequity and have been a significant exacerbator of the overall inequity of psychiatric service provision. Future policy decisions wishing to reduce this inequity should take care to reduce the risk posed by expanding telepsychiatry.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Análisis de Datos , Pandemias , Psiquiatría , Telemedicina , Psiquiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Humanos , Australia/epidemiología , Consulta Remota/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/normas , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
Telemed J E Health ; 29(10): 1492-1503, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36787485

RESUMEN

Aim: To investigate patterns of virtual prenatal visits and examine reasons for not pursuing virtual visits for prenatal care. Methods: A pooled cross-sectional study used Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System from October 2020 through June 2021, a nationally representative surveillance system targeted at women who recently gave live birth. Individuals (n = 11,829) who reported their prenatal care experiences were included. A modified poison regression estimated prevalence ratios for virtual prenatal visits and reasons for not using virtual services. Results: One-third of participants used virtual prenatal care. Hispanics were more likely to use virtual prenatal care than whites. Compared with college graduates, those with high school graduation (Prevalence Ratios [PR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.99; p = 0.033) or some college education (PR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.96; p = 0.009) were less likely to use virtual visits. A preference for in-person was the most common reason for not pursuing virtual visits (77.1%), followed by no available virtual appointments (29.5%), technology barriers (6.1%), and no private space (1.7%). Individuals with less than or with high school graduation had 4.16 times (95% CI 2.32-7.46; p ≤ 0.001) and 2.72 times (95% CI 1.67-4.43; p ≤ 0.001) greater technology barriers, and 10.03 times (95% CI 3.42-29.46; p ≤ 0.001) and 4.29 times (95% CI 1.56-11.80; p = 0.005) greater likelihood of lacking private space, respectively, while they had a lesser in-person preference. Conclusions: In a disrupted health care landscape, barriers to accessing virtual prenatal care may have further exacerbated access to care and effective management of pregnancy among those underserved. The findings provide practical implications for safe and effective prenatal care.


Asunto(s)
Atención Prenatal , Telemedicina , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Transversales , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Vet Rec ; 192(4): e2385, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36342030

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Telehealth adoption is being fueled by both technological breakthroughs and societal demands; however, veterinarians have yet to fully embrace the concept of telemedicine, limiting its use and potential benefits. The goal of this study was to evaluate how effective the multi-theory model (MTM) of health behaviour change explains the initiation and sustenance of telehealth use among veterinarians. METHODS: For this cross-sectional study, a research company was contracted to disseminate the MTM-based online survey to veterinarians currently engaged in clinical practice within the United States. RESULTS: A total of 243 veterinarians participated in this study. The most frequently reported age group among participants was 31-40 years (33.7%, n = 82). It was also noted that the majority of participants were female (70.0%, n = 170) and white (76.5%, n = 186). Hierarchical multiple regression showed that participatory dialogue (p = 0.037), species (p = 0.013) and previous monthly telehealth use (p = 0.040) were significant explanatory variables of initiation of telehealth use. Moreover, emotional transformation (p < 0.001) and previous monthly telehealth use (p = 0.035) were significant explanatory variables of sustenance of telehealth use. LIMITATIONS: The data were collected in July 2020, during a global pandemic, in which telehealth use surged across a variety of professions. As a result, the findings of the study may not be relevant in periods when there is no pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this study, researchers, educators and veterinary professionals should consider using MTM as theoretical framework to develop interventions to enhance telehealth use.


Asunto(s)
Telemedicina , Veterinarios , Medicina Veterinaria , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Intención , Pandemias , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Veterinarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Veterinaria/métodos , Medicina Veterinaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Veterinaria/tendencias
15.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 34(4): 1254-1269, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661754

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe skin disease prevalence, access to dermatologic care, and teledermatology interest among American Indians and Alaska Natives. METHODS: Data were collected via self-report surveys administered in person at two community powwows in Denver, Colorado in 2021 and 2022. RESULTS: Most American Indian and/or Alaska Native respondents (94.5%, n=225) reported at least one skin disease. The top three active skin diseases among adolescents were acne, scarring, and eczema. The top three among adults were dry skin, hair loss, and acne. Only 20.9% (n=47) of respondents with skin disease had seen a dermatologist. Approximately one-third of respondents (34.0%, n=81) were open to engaging with teledermatology in their home; 43.3% (n=103) were open to engaging with teledermatology in their local clinic; 42.0% (n=100) were not interested in engaging teledermatology from their home or in their local clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Skin disease is prevalent and access to dermatologic care is poor among American Indian and Alaska Native people.


Asunto(s)
Nativos Alasqueños , Dermatología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Indios Norteamericanos , Enfermedades de la Piel , Telemedicina , Humanos , Nativos Alasqueños/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Adulto , Adolescente , Masculino , Enfermedades de la Piel/etnología , Enfermedades de la Piel/terapia , Adulto Joven , Indios Norteamericanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Anciano , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud
17.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 74(6): 812-818, 2022 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35849504

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the literature on the utilization and effectiveness of electronic-health technologies (eHealth), such as smartphone applications, in managing patients with celiac disease (CD). METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were all searched (until February 2021). Inclusion criteria were full-text English articles reporting original data on the use of eHealth technologies in the follow-up of CD patients, with no age restriction. Exclusion criteria were studies only using non-interactive websites and phone consultation as the primary eHealth method. The results were summarized narratively. RESULTS: Using identified keywords, 926 unique studies were identified. After title and abstract screening by two independent reviewers, 26 studies were reviewed in full text. Finally, eight studies were included in this systematic review, and their quality appraised using standardized forms. Of the eight studies, six were randomized-controlled trials, one mixed-methods study, and one cross-sectional, observational study. Studies were assessed to be of "low" to "moderate" methodological quality. Studied eHealth technologies included web-based interventions, smartphone applications, text messaging, and online consultations. The most consistently reported effects related to improved quality of life (number of studies = 4), knowledge on CD (n = 3), and dietary adherence (n = 2); notably, only one study reported reduced costs of eHealth vs. standard (in-office) care. CONCLUSIONS: Although eHealth has the potential to improve the management of CD, so far, the research in the field is scarce and generally of low-moderate methodological quality. Hence, the effectiveness of eHealth in CD management remains uncertain, and more high-quality evidence is required before its utility is known.


Asunto(s)
Tecnología Biomédica , Enfermedad Celíaca , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Telemedicina , Enfermedad Celíaca/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(7): e2220053, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35788672

RESUMEN

Importance: Logistical challenges such as travel time and distance to a clinical trial site can be a barrier to patient participation. The association of remote technology use and other decentralization tools that can reduce these barriers with likelihood to enroll in cancer trials is not well understood. Objective: To assess the association of remote technology and other decentralization tools used to reduce participation-related time and travel with the likelihood to enroll in cancer clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between July 6 and September 8, 2021, a 41-question, cross-sectional, internet-based survey was administered to patients with cancer and survivors of cancer in the US who had been diagnosed with or treated for cancer in the past 7 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Increase in self-reported likelihood to enroll in cancer clinical trials that use remote technology and other decentralization tools to decrease the need for travel to the trial site. Results: There were 1183 survey respondents, with a mean (SD) age of 58.2 (12.5) years. Respondents self-reported their gender, race and ethnicity, cancer type, and treatment status. Of the 1183 respondents, 848 (72%) were female, 296 (25%) were male, 8 (1%) were other/nonbinary, and 31 (3%) declined to answer. With regard to race, 28 respondents (3%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 25 (2%) were Asian, 234 (20%) were Black or African American, 20 (2%) were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 825 (70%) were White, and 51 (4%) declined to answer. With regard to ethnicity, 115 respondents (10%) were Hispanic, Latino/Latina, or of Spanish origin, whereas 1017 (86%) were not and 51 (4%) declined to answer. Regarding cancer type and treatment status, 483 respondents (41%) either had or had survived breast cancer and 325 (28%) were being treated for cancer during the survey period. Individuals older than 55 years were more likely to say that they would only participate in trials no farther from their home than their regular care health care practitioner compared with younger respondents (26% vs 16%, respectively; P = .02). Higher-income earners (ie, those in households earning >$125 000/y) were significantly more likely than lower-income earners (ie, those in households earning <$70 000/y) to say they would participate in trials requiring additional effort (62% vs 41%, respectively; P = .03). If given the opportunity to enroll in a cancer clinical trial that required travel farther than their regular care, a majority of respondents (range, 60%-85%) indicated that they would be more likely to participate if the trial used remote technology and other tools to decrease the need for travel to a trial site. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, the survey findings suggest that cancer clinical trials leveraging remote technology and decentralization tools to reduce patient time and travel burden associated with participation may increase the patient consent rate.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Neoplasias , Participación del Paciente , Telemedicina , Anciano , Investigación Biomédica , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/instrumentación , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Tecnología , Telemedicina/instrumentación , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
J. health med. sci. (Print) ; 8(3): 141-148, jul.2022. tab, graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1442512

RESUMEN

INTRODUCCIÓN La telerradiología se basa en el despliegue de radiólogos a distancia para evaluar estudios de dicha especialidad. Actualmente hay evidencia limitada sobre las tasas de error de evaluaciones en telerradiología. Este estudio corresponde a una revisión de las discrepancias entre los informes preliminares y finales de tomografía computada (TC) de una unidad de urgencia telerradiológica. OBJETIVO Determinar las discrepancias de las reevaluaciones (addendum) en los informes radiológicos de TC en una unidad de telerradiología de urgencia. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS La recolección de datos se planificó a modo de tabla de cotejo, en la cual se tabularon casos de reevaluaciones de urgencia desde el mes de enero hasta mayo del año 2021, en base a la categorización Agrawal. RESULTADOS De una total de 111.599, 836 informes presentaron addendum, que corresponden al 0,74% del total informado, La categoría Agrawal 0 agrupó la mayor cantidad de casos y los exámenes de TC especialidad de cuerpo se encuentran los segmentos con mayores requerimientos de reevaluación. Discusión: Los valores obtenidos permiten establecer una baja incidencia de reevaluaciones y de la gravedad de estas, apuntando a errores asociados a canales de comunicación, redacción y elaboración de informes con especial énfasis en estudios TC Tórax y Abdomen/Pelvis. CONCLUSIÓN El porcentaje de cumplimiento de un 99,26% de exactitud en los informes permite concluir la alta confiabilidad y la calidad del servicio de telerradiología de la empresa en cuestión durante el periodo evaluado y el empleo de medidas correctivas basadas en organización, gestión e instrumentalización tecnológica


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Epidemiología Descriptiva
20.
Geneve; WHO; July 29, 2022. 424 p.
Monografía en Inglés | BIGG - guías GRADE | ID: biblio-1398121

RESUMEN

As the HIV response moves to focusing on closing the remaining gaps in prevention, testing and treatment services, an evolution in the underlying routine data systems is needed to identify epidemiologic patterns and service gaps, and accelerate focused interventions. These guidelines focus on the collection and use of person-centred data across the HIV cascade ­ from prevention, testing and treatment to longer-term health care ­ building upon 2017 and 2020 strategic information guidelines. The updated guidelines present a standard minimum dataset, priority indicators and recommendations to strengthen data use across HIV prevention, testing and treatment, and linkages to services for sexually transmitted infections, viral hepatitis, tuberculosis and cervical cancer. The guidelines also cover the use of routinely collected data for HIV surveillance (including measurement of HIV prevalence and incidence) and emphasize the use of data from different sources to gain a better picture of epidemiologic trends. Digital data plays an important role in the transformation of health information systems and the guidelines discuss the governance of digital health data in the transition from paper-based to digital systems and the importance of interoperability, unique identifiers, data security, privacy and confidentiality, and data access. Expanding national health information systems to include individual-level data will improve the quality and sustainability of data collection and use for improved health decision making and health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Interpretación Estadística de Datos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...